But is this true?? the cheap bit yes, but the EASY?? I don't think so or at least in my limited experience. I can set up Win'98, Winproxy(internet sharing), Vpop3(retrieval & distribution of email) & Apache (internal webserver) in about 1.25Hr, it works, it's stablish. I have tried to do the same with both RedHat & Suse & after several days go back to Win'98. Maybe I'm not trying hard enough but I suspect there are 100's like me out there.
On a lighter note see the attachment, I have just been offered these anyone want any??
Alan..
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Sims [mailto:nospam [at] lombard.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, 29 February 2000 12:55
To: 'sheflug [at] vuw.ac.nz'
Subject: RE: Explaining Linux
On Tuesday, February 29, 2000 11:52 AM, Al Hudson [SMTP:eah106 [at] york.ac.uk] wrote:
> To be honest, I wouldn't recommend Linux for anyone other than the
> hobbyist........
or anyone needing a cheap & easy server, of course.
"WorldSecure Server <lombard.co.uk>" made the following
annotations on 02/29/00 13:00:19
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The opinions expressed within this email represent those of the
individual and not necessarily those of Lombard.
The contents of this Email may be privileged and are confidential. It may not be disclosed to or used by anyone other than the addressee(s), nor copied in any way. If received in error, please advise the sender, then delete from your system.
Should you wish to use Email as a mode of communication, Lombard are unable to guarantee the security of Email content outside of our own computer systems.
==============================================================================
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheffield Linux User's Group - http://www.sheflug.co.uk
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to
- <sheflug-request [at] vuw.ac.nz> - with the word
"unsubscribe" in the body of the message.
GNU the choice of a complete generation.